Our club is in the Chicago area and wanted to pick a book about Chicago. It was an okay read. We thought the narrative was somewhat choppy and the information, while interesting, was not a "page-turner." It was, however, sort of cool to be reading the book at the same time the Mann Act was in the news because of the Eliot Spitzer affair.

Our book club decided to read "Mockingbird: A portrait of Harper Lee," by Charles Shields in combination with "To Kill a Mockingbird." Several of us could not get through the unauthorized biography. Too many irrelevant details, did we really need to know that the new courthouse in Lee's hometown was built without a basement? And it never really answered the question, "Why didn't Harper Lee write another book?" Lee doesn't grant interviews, so the book is a compendium of random facts.

That said, it was a pleasure to re-read "To Kill a Mockingbird." We had all read it as teenagers and it was interesting to see how our perspective had changed (we identified with the adults, instead of the child narrator). I rented the DVD of the movie and played some of the key scenes (the opening, the trial, the ham chase, Boo Radley).

I finished Shields' book and I thought it added some nuance to Harper Lee's book. He provides discussion questions on his website and is available to talk to book clubs by phone.

A page-turner that will have you on the edge of your seat. However, the ending disappointed as it was merely a way to separate this second in a series from the third and final installment. Also, Larsson's depiction of women (who were either sluts or lesbians) was truly laughable. Despite its flaws, I'll will read the final book in the trilogy to see how it turns out.

Do NOT believe the reviews on Amazon that raved about this book because those reviewers obviously did not read the same book our club did. The book was poorly written and edited (obvious continuity errors), had no plot and was sophomoric. It reminded us of a high school term paper that had been packed with meaningless details in order to bump up the word count. We would have given it zero stars if that had been possible.