Introduction

Winner of New Mexico-Arizona Book Awards (2014) in Fiction (historical fiction) and Best Book/New Mexico categories

They arrived in New Mexico ready for adventure, or at least resigned to it. But hope quickly turned to hardship as they were forced to adapt to a rugged military town where everything was a secret?including what their husbands were doing at the lab. Though they were strangers, they joined together?adapting to a landscape as fierce as it was absorbing, full of the banalities of everyday life and the drama of scientific discovery.

While the bomb was being invented, babies were born, friendships were forged, children grew up, and Los Alamos gradually transformed into a real community: one that was strained by the words they couldn't say out loud or in letters, and by the freedom they didn't have. But the end of the war would bring even bigger challenges, as the scientists and their families struggled with the burden of their contribution to the most destructive force in the history of mankind.

The Wives of Los Alamos is a testament to a remarkable group of real-life women and an exploration of a crucial, largely unconsidered aspect of one of the most monumental research projects in modern history.

Mountains and Plains bestseller list
Denver Post bestseller list
Mid-Atlantic bestseller list

Editorial Review

An Amazon Best Book of the Month, February 2014: Written in the first person plural--the collective “we”--TaraShea Nesbit’s debut is both understated and poetic as it describes the lives of the women who accompanied their scientist husbands to the American desert to work on a secret project that turned out to be the making of the atomic bomb. “We were Western women born in California and Montana, East Coast women born in Connecticut and New York, Midwestern women born in Nebraska and Ohio. . .” Nesbit writes, and so they were: all different, of course, and yet much the same as they came to bear and raise children, and make lives in a dangerous and secretive time and place. What was it like to be attached to a project you weren’t allowed any knowledge of? How did such a world-changing invention change you, your marriage, your family? These are the questions Nesbit tackles in this stunning novel, both concise and elliptical. In style, it echoes Julie Otsuka’s The Buddha in the Attic (also a first-person-plural account, of the Japanese internment in WWII.) Also like that book, it sheds light on historical events too rarely discussed in literature. This debut is a tour-de-force, in a quiet, careful and winning way. --Sara Nelson

Excerpt

No Excerpt Currently Available

Discussion Questions

1) The Wives of Los Alamos is narrated in first person plural. While individual women are mentioned, the wives speak as a group. How does this affect your understanding of them and their story? Do you come to know any of them as individuals? What was your emotional response to this stylistic choice?

2) From the very beginning, the town of Los Alamos is one defined by secrets. Who is keeping information secret from whom? What type of information does each group within the community have access to and how does that information give them power?

3) Where do you see issues of race and class come up in the novel? Do race and class differences manifest themselves differently in this small, isolated community than they do in the world at large?

4) The wives of Los Alamos are often pregnant, their families steadily growing. What does it mean to be a mother in this community? What do you think it would be like to grow up in that environment, only to move back into the world after the bombs had been dropped?

5) In the days approaching the test of the atomic bomb, the husbands become increasingly distant. The wives are quick to wonder if the men have taken a lover, or if perhaps, in their isolation, they’ve let themselves go too much. How does this reflect back on the wives’ roles in Los Alamos? And in their marriages?

6) At times the wives seem to use their sexuality as a means of gathering information or making a social statement. Where do you see that come up in the book? In these instances, are they acting individually or as a group?

7) When the wives watch the test bomb explode, they think, “Our town had made something as strong and bright as the sun.” Has this been a communal creation? If it has been, what does it suggest about the accountability of all of the residents of the town going forward?

8) Regarding the creation of the bomb, the wives note, “On this place formed millions of years ago by a huge eruption, our husbands had just made their own.” What is suggested in that comparison about the forces of creation and destruction? Was the bomb part of an on-going cycle, or was it a disruption of one?

9) The wives have very different responses to the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. What are those responses? Are you able to relate to all of them, or are there some you have trouble understanding?

10) Nesbit often mixes mundane details of everyday life with the monumental events discussed in the novel. For example, after the bombs are dropped in Japan, the wives exclaim, “You can build a bomb but you cannot fix a leaky faucet!” How does this mixture of the quotidian with the tremendous change your understanding of these people and events?

11) After Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the community in Los Alamos becomes the focus of national media. How do the wives respond to this attention?

12) In the final days of the project, the Director, J. Robert Oppenheimer, says to the community, “If you are a scientist you believe that it is good to find out how the world works; that it is good to find out what the realities are; that it is good to turn over to mankind at large the greatest possible power to control the world and to deal with it according to its lights and values.” Do you agree with that statement? What do you think the responsibility of a scientist is to society at large? Who should act as custodian to “the greatest possible power to control the world”?

13) Oppenheimer ends his speech to the scientists and wives by saying, “A day may come when men and women will curse the name Los Alamos.” Do you curse the name? Why or why not?

14) The scientists tell their wives shortly after Oppenheimer’s speech, “The world knowing the bomb exists is the best hope for peace.” What do they mean by that? Do you agree?

15) As the community of Los Alamos disperses, the wives observe: “Saying good-bye to our friends was not just saying good-by to them, we were saying good-bye to part of ourselves.” What are they leaving behind as they leave Los Alamos? How has this experience changed them?

Suggested by Members

by kathymur92 (see profile) 01/21/15

Weblinks

»	Author's web site

Book Club Recommendations

Recommended to book clubs by 9 of 9 members.

Member Reviews

Rate this book